Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Omni Kumar vs Arvid Nordquist Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumar vs Nordquist analysis and find out who is favored!
Omni Kumar vs Arvid Nordquist Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kumar 2 - 0 Nordquist
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumar has won 54.06% of points on their second serve, while Nordquist has won 52.72%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumar, in recent form, has won 57.22% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nordquist has won 51.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.82% and 31.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumar has saved 55.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nordquist has saved 58.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumar has won 63.77% of matches played (W/L 44/ 25), with Nordquist winning 48.39% (W/L 15/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 234/ 130), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9). Nordquist has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 43/ 40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 47% (W/L 15/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.91% of matches (W/L 34/ 12), where as Nordquist has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.39% of matches (W/L 15/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kumar winning 2 times and Nordquist being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Kumar winning 4 and Nordquist winning 0. The last match between Kumar and Nordquist was at the M15 Los Angeles, 23-06-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Omni Kumar getting the victory 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:24:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kumar and Nordquist have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kumar winning 0 times and Nordquist 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kumar winning 0, and Nordquist 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumar has played against opponents with an average rank of 212.14 while Nordquist has played against players with an average rank of 156.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumar has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nordquist has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumar has converted 48.26% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nordquist has converted 49.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
381
Rank
348
High
22
Age
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
892
Rank
889
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
63% (245-144)
Career Total W/L
51% (122-119)
63% (15-9)
YTD W/L
61% (11-7)
$20,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Omni Kumar vs Arvid Nordquist For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kumar VS Nordquist
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Omni Kumar | Arvid Nordquist |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:30 | 1:24:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (50/91) | 62% (64/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 86% (43/50) | 53% (34/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (26/41) | 40% (16/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 0% (0/2) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (54/104) | 24% (22/91) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Omni Kumar
Player
Arvid Nordquist
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
64%
(
23 of
36)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
22
|
||||
| 7-5 6-1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Arvid Nordquist
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
4
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Omni Kumar | Arvid Nordquist |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (15/9) | 61% (11/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (32/23) | 61% (25/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (266/233) | 54% (207/178) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 55% (6/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 31 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:41 | 1:32:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 245.71 | 126.44 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1112/1649) | 73% (658/897) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (709/1112) | 64% (423/658) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (277/537) | 53% (126/239) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (80/168) | 49% (38/77) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (677/1582) | 39% (337/857) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (13/7) | 61% (11/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (15/24) | 65% (11/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 25% (8/2) |
Omni Kumar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Omni Kumar
38%
(
12 of
32)
1st Serve %
76%
(
22 of
29)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
11 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
39
Total Points Won
22
|
6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kai Wehnelt
77%
(
73 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
96)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Lopez Montagud
Player
Omni Kumar
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
81%
(
50 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
87%
(
52 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Lorenzo Carboni
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kirill Kivattsev
Player
Omni Kumar
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
44 of
58)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Michele Ribecai
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
32 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
39 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Simon Beaupain
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
75%
(
33 of
44)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Kiyan Santino Kasemi
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Arvid Nordquist Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Arvid Nordquist
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
29 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Taha Baadi
89%
(
63 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
51 of
75)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Miles Jones
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Peter Bertran
Player
Arvid Nordquist
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Spencer Gray
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
30 of
37)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
18 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 1-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Corentin Denolly
Player
Arvid Nordquist
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
83%
(
58 of
70)
4
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
25%
(
6 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(7) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Facundo Bermejo
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arvid Nordquist
Player
Nathan Ponwith
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kumar Vs Nordquist Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kumar are available here and Nordquist photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
